Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ibrahiim al Balooshi
If it is proven that the Omani European Trade Blade is a myth could it be that the Omanis copied a long blade Red Sea variant into their history books...and gave it a flexible blade and spatulate tip? 
Regards,
Ibrahiim al Balooshi.
|
This seems the only logical way to approach the issue to me. If the flexible blades weren't imported, and it seems they weren't. Then you have to account for:
- Fake stamps, obviously copied from European stamps and only introduced into the local Omani swords because the stamps represented something that was respected and recognized locally
- Style of fullers and blade length
- Presence of typical trade blades in surrounding areas
- dramatic change in style and adoption of a totally new sword form corresponding closely with European trade blade profiles
I'm still interested in the sayfs with genuine trade blades that I've linked before, previously you discounted them as Omani based only on the blades, but is there a way to distinguish the hilts regionally? Perhaps I misunderstood you previous comments on them but it seemed you were saying they couldn't be Omani not based on the hilts, but because the blades were stiff.
I'm still not convinced the stiff blades weren't in use in Oman. As you said, the old short sword has a stiff blade, so there's no reason an Omani would object to a stiff European blade...
Basically it seems to me the most logical answer is that the flexible blades are designed to fit the dance (which is not to say they still wouldn't deliver a nasty cut, I'm sure they do!) and were adapted from European trade blades already present in the region. From the quotes you included in your last post it would seem these local flexible blades would have been in use by the early 1800s.
I think that's the most that can be said from the available data. Probably we are never going to agree entirely but I think we are getting closer.
There is no need to look for a flexible Omani specific trade blade probably.
Cheers,
Iain