Then what do you guys think about the kerises they claim to be Tangguh Sriwijaya? I bet the classification criteria does not come from Javanese keraton's literatures ... How confident can we say that those kerises were actually from Sriwijaya? Were they more like Javanese imports, or local made, or kerises from later Islamic era? My keris recognition skills are barely enough to make the deduction from pictures from the Internet ... besides, I haven't seen ANY physical example of a Sriwijaya keris.
P.S.: David, thanks .. To me, it's more like obsessive than interesting
