Forum: Ethnographic Weapons
16th March 2007, 07:18 AM
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 51,334
First of all, I never once made an incorrect...
First of all, I never once made an incorrect statement about sword #37. Secondly, my dismissal of the dating, isn't a dismissal, it's a complication. It's not cavalier, it's based on other evidence...
|
Forum: Ethnographic Weapons
15th March 2007, 06:16 AM
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 51,334
|
Forum: Ethnographic Weapons
15th March 2007, 01:58 AM
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 51,334
Excuse me, but NONE of the swords I posted are...
Excuse me, but NONE of the swords I posted are Mamluk in origin. ZERO. They're all Ottoman. Secondly, I didn't show a picture of Persian warriors fighting Mongols. The second image is Persians...
|
Forum: Ethnographic Weapons
14th March 2007, 11:21 PM
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 51,334
|
Forum: Ethnographic Weapons
14th March 2007, 09:16 PM
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 51,334
|
Forum: Ethnographic Weapons
14th March 2007, 09:23 AM
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 51,334
It's really quite simple. The reign of Fatih...
It's really quite simple. The reign of Fatih Sultan Mehmet was 1444-1446, a takeover by his father, and then 1451-1481. 1444-1446 is the first half of the fifteenth century, is it not? There are...
|
Forum: Ethnographic Weapons
13th March 2007, 07:48 AM
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 51,334
|