Ethnographic Arms & Armour

Ethnographic Arms & Armour (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/index.php)
-   Keris Warung Kopi (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Help to Identify a Deder Design (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=31384)

Jayaningkurnia 28th June 2026 04:35 AM

Help to Identify a Deder Design
 
4 Attachment(s)
Greetings everyone,

I recently acquired a keris that comes with a deder carved with a design that is new to me. The person I acquired it from does not is also not familiar with the design (nor the type of wood used), but cited "Cirebon sepuh" as a possible timeline.

To my eyes the carvings look like a female figure enveloped in lotus/waterlilies leaves and flowers. The female figure is 'prettier' than the ones I've seen in 'kulonan'/western Java 'buto' carving style, or the 'pottre sadhu' Madurese design.

The carvings seems quite fine and intricate, with a 'krawangan'/pass-through holes under the chin of the female figure (behind the leaves). The wood has a reddish dark brown colour with a little patina (notably at the tip of the nose).

Grateful if anyone has any knowledge or reference on what this deder design is called, its backstory, and where does it commonly attributed to? Or whether it is likely a modern/contemporary design created with some creative liberty?

Thank you in advance!

A. G. Maisey 28th June 2026 05:20 AM

I can only comment on what I think I can see in the photos, & photos are rarely sufficient to judge this sort of thing very well.

The style of carving looks like it was done in Madura. This specific design I have not previously seen.

The wood appears to be black, is it ebony, or is it stained black? Ebony is a very heavy wood that sinks in water.

I cannot estimate age from the photos.

David 29th June 2026 07:24 PM

To me this is a rather attractive hilt, but i can't say that i am fully convinced it is a female character. I mean, it could be, but i cannot see in any of you photos any specific anatomy that could be identified as specifically female. That is not to say that it could not be a female figure, just that i don't find it obviously so.
I would agree with Alan that by the carving style this appears to be Madurese in origin. It isn't a brand new carving for sure, but i suspect it is 20th century.
Of course, better photos would be helpful. You should try photographing it in more even, natural light, such as what is available on a bright, but overcast day. But it does appear to be a well carved and attractive figure. But even if we had better photos i am not convinced it would be possible to identify it as a specific character.
Interesting mendhak it has. it appears to be bone of some type.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.