![]() |
Saxon Arms
4 Attachment(s)
Does anyone here still collect or own Saxon edged weapons? I'm trying to catalog the pommel species right now. There are hexagonal, octagonal, round and pommels with lines.
I'm always looking for Saxon Arms |
Interesting question, not sure which specific Saxon classification, which edged weapons, which period and regions, but I'm sure most of these categories are still collected. Do you mean German swords in general, or only those associated with Saxony?
Interesting approach to categorizations focused on pommel types, much as in AVB Norman's "The Rapier and Smallsword". I am always curious on the proper descriptive terms used for all the various geometric shapes. Norman avoided adding blades into his classifications of sword hilts (1400-1821) because they were typically either trade blades, or exchanged on hilts in refurbishing of swords. Mostly the classifications were focused toward the period of the hilt styles, and this same system was used with the categories of pommels. Curiously I do not recall a 'Saxon' classification specified in either. Can you add any details on the swords you have illustrated? |
Have you checked Forrer's "European Sword Pommels"? I'm not sure if there are any Saxon ones in there, but it's got pommels up the wazoo. :p
|
Quote:
As pommels were often acquired by cutlers and armorers who assembled swords from individual vendors it seems like it would be hard to distinguish specific origin. Also swords being refurbished often ended up with pommels from other sources. I have had for example British pattern military swords with pommels that may have been much earlier than the type they were now on. |
Quote:
|
I think I found which reference you mean. I was going through Norman (1980) looking through the pommels chapter for anything described as Saxon, as well as indexes but found nothing with that specific designation.
I found the book "Die Schwerter und Schwertknaufe der Sammlung Carl van Schwerzbac-Bregenz" by Dr. R.Forrers, Leipzig, 1905. E. Oakeshott "The Sword in the Age of Chivalry" (1964) is also mentioned in which the various types of sword pommels he lists in his alphabetically categorized typology of them is pretty thoroughly represented. I found no mention however of any specified as Saxon. It seems I have seen the term Saxon used on occasion on examples in auctions etc. but cannot recall specifics. I have seen the term often used for military swords of the state of Saxony origins. Searching online mostly the term is used for numerous reproduction models from well known producers. Looking forward to examples of swords of antiquity described as Saxon from references. We never stop learning :) |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thank you so much for the heads up on this book! Looks pretty essential for sword study that would greatly accompany these others. Sounds like it would be valuable for Merenti in his research as well. . |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I have always recognized the axiom, 'weapon forms have no geographic boundaries' . Obviously certain forms had preferences in certain local regions and were preponderant in them, but was there some distinct characteristic that would signify a sword was specifically from the defined Saxon area? Clearly there have been notable geopolitical changes in this state over many centuries, so that further begs the question, what defines a Saxon sword? In the more recent centuries of course, military swords would have cyphers, inscriptions, coats of arms which specified Saxony, but with images of edged weapons without such identifying elements, what in the images in the OP signifies that these are 'Saxon'. The serpent on the ricasso in the second image is of course associated with Milan and used by makers variously in that context. |
Thank you for your many responses. I really should have been more specific, I'm really concerned with the Saxon rapiers, daggers and estoc made for the Elector and for the Trabant Guard
|
Quote:
the Reformation gave Saxony a very high status. I'll try to share what I know so far this weekend. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
What reference is this!? I must have it :) it surely leaves the standard compendiums in the dust. |
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sounds pretty obscure and expensive.........the search begins. Your endorsement is motivating, so as Holmes would say, "the games afoot!". |
5 Attachment(s)
1.0
I try to give my opinion a little free rein here, I also listen to your opinions. I'm happy to accept additions and try to incorporate them. Of course, I will also name sources. I would like to start with what I think is the simplest variant The Saxon estoc with a simple eight-sided pommel and lines. Carried as a secondary weapon on horseback. In the version shown, probably for simple court servants on horseback. The version with different blades (triangular and square) and usually provided with the Pi brand. There were leather sleeves and metal sleeves for the transition from scabbard to blade. A chronological classification is difficult, but I assume 1590-1600. Sidenotes: 1. The mounted contingent of the Saxon Trebanten guard was formed of a company of one hundred men on black horses. 2.Their uniform included a blackened comb morion (a type of open helmet used from the middle 16th to early 17th centuries) with etched and gilt ornament, black doublets and yellow hose and stockings, the colours being those of the Arms of the Electors of Saxony. Source: Copyright © 2016 Peter Finer |
1 Attachment(s)
1.1
2 estocs with triangular blades and the same pommel. From the Rüstkammer collection in Dresden. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.