![]() |
Oriental ethno powder flask
1 Attachment(s)
Sorry to divert.
I don't find a model similar to this in the web or the few books i have. Could it be Malabar, Indo Persian, ot thereabouts ? It looks well used and a bit old ... Would anyone kindly give me a track ? Thanks a lot fernando |
afghan charger
|
What tells you that it is Afghan?
|
shape of piece plus file work on spring . will post some pics if I get time. This is a very nice piece
|
1 Attachment(s)
Thank you Ward.
Quite a surprise this is Afghan, and so it seems for Ariel, too. I am anxious to see those pictures of yours. I would like to see the use of that empty hole, near the spout cap. It would either be for another hook, like the existing one in the center, for a double suspended "lanyard", or for some device to hold the spout cap tightly closed. I hope your pictures will help to find that out. Thanks again |
1 Attachment(s)
Here is a quick pic
|
1 Attachment(s)
Thank you very much Ward
Very nice and deeply interesting. They all have a common suspension system ... double hanging from paralel rings, the only basic difference between those and mine. I wonder what is the use of that little portruding device in the container bottom. I see now that mine use to have one of those, but is cut off now. If ever you get a bit more defined picture, kindly do. BTW, any specific region in Afghanistan they come from ? Thanks again |
2 Attachment(s)
Here are some better images. I have to reduce the size of the photos so much I lose detail. Beyond being Turkoman I have never found a more detailed exact source in regard to cities.the bump protruding from the bottom of yours is the end of rod holding spring to container
|
Beautifull and informative set. Still lots of detail can be observed, including the genuine chain. It's amazing that not much gunpowder you could keep in these reduced flasks ... something i will search further. I think i will now hang my example next to my Jezail Rifle stand. Thanks again for your pictures and explanation.
|
I would venture a guess that these were for priming the pan rather than dispensing a pre measured charge for the projectile .
|
yes I agree. It is used for priming. Much finer powder was used in pan than in the main charge.
|
Thank you Rick ... good shot.
You are obviously right. I was silly i didn't think twice, i should have figured this one myself, if i first reread my own little resources in the subject. Not only priming flasks contained finer powder, as also prevailled in use for priming the casserole ( pan ) even when pre-packed charges were already carried in units ( later cartridges ) for the bullit loads. Thank you Ward Would you guess an age on my piece ? 19th century ? I promiss this is the last question ... i am already exceeding the reasonable extension for a thread out of the Forum vocation ... and your patience. fernando |
19h century sounds about right .
|
Much obliged
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.