![]() |
New Kilij: need opinions and translation
12 Attachment(s)
Yes, Virginia, there IS a Santa Claus!
One still can find a terminal sleeper on E-bay and get it for a song. This one just arrived and got a very gentle cleaning. The sword and the scabbard were sold separately, because they "did not fit". Reason #1: the upper fitting on the scabbard was put upside down and, #2: the wood is so dry that it almost crumbles and the leather is also shriveled. The blade is hand made, provincial manufacture, not damascus and has 2 noticeable nicks on the edge. There is an almost intact Koftgari inscription on one side (hope it does not say "Made in Taiwan") and I need help translating it. They are photographed in overlapping segments. My guess it is an Ottoman, but not Turkish, one: the quality of the blade and the koftgari is far too inferior to real Ottoman beauties. Syrian? Egyptian? Iraqi? Perhaps, East Anatolian/Kurdish? Please help. |
hello would be helpful if script was not upside down
ward |
It does look like Syrian to me, especially the scabbard, and the style of the koftegari.
|
Further, it is rather a shamshir that a kilij (SenSei forgive me my insolence) :D
|
5 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
Any objections? |
I am being impolite and putting this thread up on the top: perhaps somebody will pay attention and translate the inscription. Please? ;)
|
Dear Ariel, I will play devil's advocate
If it has no back edge close to tip, it is shamshir not kilij. I am looking it again and again and I have a strange feeling. It has all the pieces of an old shamshir but also something is not quite “right”. I am possibly having nightmares and maybe I sound rude but… a. The side opening of the wood up on the throat looks wrong. It should be wider. b. The guard is broken in wrong place. Maybe it is upside down? c. The two fittings with the rings look different of the other fittings, more “cheap” (later?). I cannot imagine anyone to trust these things in a furious horse riding. My conclusion is that it is an old shamshir that it was wrongly restored and “upgraded” sometime in the last 50 years. Where? Two countries come to my mind Syria and Bulgaria, the later because of the copper used. I wish to hear that I am totally wrong. |
Yannis,
The wood is very, very old and dry. this is why the opening is so narrow. It needs to be replaced. The small fittings are different from the rest, although they also look old and worn. The big fittings are very professionally repoussed whereas the small are chased. The guard is old. The reason it does not fit perfectly is the crumbled "cement" within it, and the direction is correct. I shall clean it and reposition properly. Overall, there is no doubt in my mind this is old and was not recently renovated. Old repairs? Sure, why not. The idea of Bulgarian origin is interesting and did not occur to me. May just be the case. As to the name... Turks call their swords Kilij, Iranians call them Shamshir.A Turkish sword with Shamshir blade was called Ajem Kilij, and one with a wavy blade Atesh Kilij. Obviously, this is neither. And it is not Turkish, as we agree. It was fashioned in the Ottoman style but with a local blade. God only knows what the locals called it. I use the word Kilij for convenience, because shamshir implies a very special form of the blade which is not the case. |
Gentlemen,
Yannis' observations are astute. There is an entire group of late 19th and 20th century swords which were made in the bazaar such as this one-- probably they were worn by rich townies- merchants, etc.-- for weddings as is still done in the Arab states. It is to this group which the sword belongs. The blade may or may not be tempered, judging from the nick I would say not. Too, the style of the koftgari is characteristic of more recent work, c. 1920s. Nice example of a style which endures to the present. Sincerely, Ham |
Ariel,
I would say that this sword would have been called a "saif", not a Kilij, and certainly not a shamshir, check this out : http://oriental-arms.com/photos.php?id=358 The scabbard is very similar, and also the blade and the koftgari, just the hilt is different, but still, Turkish bulb hilts were called "kilwi" hilts by Syrians, and were produced in Damascus probably even more than the typical "baddawi" classical arabic hilt. EDIT: Oh and one more thing, the description on that is wrong, as pointed out by Artzi himself a long time ago on swordforum, this blade is made in damascus, not persian. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This one can legitimately be called Saif in Damascus or Kilic in Istanbul. |
I guess there was a much larger sword production centre in Damascus than presumed by many, many people.
I would really like to know if there was a sword industry in Egypt as well, being so culturally similar to Syria, and under Ottoman control as well. I would like to see a kilic 100% assured to be of Egyptian manufacture. Or even one of iraqi manufacture. Continuously seeing kilics like this one, turning out to be Syrian rather than Turkish (of course turkish style), makes me wonder if indeed most of these items labeled turkish are indeed of turkish manufacture..... |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.