A Piece of U.S. History
 

Purportedly an 1808 English boarding cutlass taken from the deck of the Guerriere when she was beaten in an action with USS Constitution Isaac Hull commanding.

Auction realized $7k plus 25% fee.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Co..._HMS_Guerriere

I think the 1808 was an American cutlass pattern. This is the British 1804 pattern:).
Could we have it back please :D

Se non e vero.....e ben trovato....

Well, that's auction houses for you; thanks for clearing that up Robert.
To answer your question.

No. :p

I guess it pretty much depends on the auction house.
What is great about these provenance examples is that they reflect the character and nuances of authentic pieces. With these, like many other historically significant forms, there are many reproduction and deliberately misrepresented items out there.

The realized price reflects the dramatic values which might attract such activity. Even a mundane item of the time such as this otherwise simple other ranks weapon carries an inherent value monetarily as history incarnate.

Interesting to read the link, and details of this battle. The American captain refused to accept the opponents surrender sword. The men off the British ship were brought aboard as the badly damaged ship sank. It would seem that after the cessation of combat, gentlemanly behavior prevailed between combatants and this cutlass probably acquired by one of the crewmen in less pronounced exchange as men and materials transferred to the Constitution.

Just notes for readers on the actual American M1808 cutlass.

These were a contract to Nathan Starr, and only 1000 ordered. They were the first departure from the familiar 'figure 8' or double disc form with its full sheet guard.
The example of OP appears to be by Gill, British maker Birmingham England.

References:
"Boarders Away" Gilkerson, p.96
"The American Sword 1775-1945" Peterson, p.52
"Small Arms of Sea Services" Rankin, p.45

I notice that there is something stamped on the spine of the blade near the guard but I can't quite make it out. :confused:

Ideas?

Rick If you are refering to the British 1804 then what you see is the Royal Cypher for King George III (GR with a crown above)

On the spine, it is the makers name, in accord with standard British practice....in this case, Gill.