![]() |
Golok or something else
6 Attachment(s)
The vendor advertised this as a Javanese Golok, late 19th or early 20 century. It seems a bit too refined to be classified as a golok, which I understand are typically more machete like. This reminds me more of a Pedang Lurus, except for the curved blade.
Comments? |
Hello Marcus,
would call it golok. Very nice piece. :) Regards, Detlef |
Golok Bengkoeloe / Bengkulu
Quote:
Marcus, Popularly referred to as: Golok Bengkoeloe / Bengkulu. Common in southern Soematera (Sumatra), southern Kalamantan (Borneo) and among the Soenda (Sunda). Best, P.S. - Dating is correct: c. late 18thC - early 20thC. - Similar to the European Hirschfanger/Hartsvanger/Forester's-sword in function. Often used to administer the 'coup de grace', especially by the Soenda when tiger-hunting. |
1 Attachment(s)
from the forum's ref section: http://www.vikingsword.com/ethsword/
|
reference item
Very similar indeed. I had to look at close ups to be sure it was not the same piece.
|
the differences are very slight. mostly i noticed around the scabbard drag. the ref one is silver. i initially thought yours was oxidized brass, but now i'm not sure it's not tarnished silver...
|
Drag
It is silver.
|
even better match then, nice one.
you can be happy goloky ;) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.