Ethnographic Arms & Armour

Ethnographic Arms & Armour (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/index.php)
-   Ethnographic Weapons (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   moro knife, please comment.... (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=17096)

manteris1 12th April 2013 08:15 PM

moro knife, please comment....
 
5 Attachment(s)
hi all, nice little punal, silver and bone 10" o/a...............thanks.............jimmy

Henk 12th April 2013 08:30 PM

Bone? Better place a close up of the hilt. Could be ivory. Nice catch.

Robert 12th April 2013 09:24 PM

Hello Jimmy and nice catch indeed!! Older style hilt possible ivory, I too would like to see close-ups of the hilt. As soon as Jose see this he will be able to give you an idea of where it was made and a time frame as well. If I had to guess (and that is exactly what it would be) I would say first quarter of twentieth century and possibly earlier. My congratulations on a great addition to your collection.

Best,
Robert

CharlesS 12th April 2013 09:57 PM

Nice catch Jimmy! I love the hilt's subtle curvature and the nice patination.
From this distance it does look like bone, but who cares??...it's a beaut! ;)

Sajen 13th April 2013 09:32 PM

Agree with Charles, equal if it is bone or ivory, it's a beauty. Age I think turn of the Centurys.

Regards,

Detlef

manteris1 14th April 2013 01:47 AM

i'm wrong...
 
hello all, i was wrong it is ivory ....................jimmy

manteris1 14th April 2013 01:58 AM

the pic's
 
5 Attachment(s)
ok........jimmy

Ferguson 14th April 2013 02:53 AM

Beautiful piece! Nice age. Gorgeous lines.
Steve

ariel 14th April 2013 06:55 AM

Could it be a rib bone? The 4th pic seems to show a longitudinal area looking like the remnant of the intercostal blood vessel/nerve path.
Any better pics?

Sajen 14th April 2013 10:34 AM

Hello Jimmy,

I am not sure, don't look really like ivory, more like well patinated bone, maybe whale bone.

Regards,

Detlef

ariel 14th April 2013 02:42 PM

It's morning and the lighting is better.... I seem to see multiple short parallel dark lines on the surface: if those are real and not artefacts of photography, dirt etc, they look like typical periosteal capillaries. Those are absent on the tusks.

CharlesS 14th April 2013 04:35 PM

I tend to agree; these pics seem to confirm the fact this it is bone, but once again, what's the big deal!...it's still a fine, gorgeous piece.

kai 15th April 2013 10:02 AM

Hello Jimmy,

I do like this punal/gunong! Looks like bone to me, too.
(More pics of this piece posted here .)

A close-up of the bolster area would be great. How do the details compare with this kris ?
(I don't want to suggest a close relationship but there seem to be some similarities.)

Regards,
Kai

Battara 16th April 2013 01:34 PM

Have Internet service at this moment. Can look at better once I get back into the USA but for now looks 1910s or earlier, and possibly Magundanao.

manteris1 16th April 2013 06:03 PM

hi all, now that its daylight and i'm sober, of course its bone.....................jimmy


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.