Keris for comments
 

Comments will be appreciated on this please.

It appears that the more I read about Keris the less I know so am hoping for some helpful comments. I bought this in a local antique shop about 20 years ago.

O/all length is 19 1/2"

Blade length is 13" and is very thin.

Hilt of horn.

Scabbard silver over wood with the "heel" appearing to be suassa.

Cup looks to be very low grade nickel silver and also looks to be too large.

It took a lot of effort to get the hilt off so appears to have been together for a long time.

Regards
Roy

some more photos
 

Exra photos

I think thats a very nice Keris Royston!
Great size, interesting hilt form.
Very unusual two part pendok with bands!
Love it.
I await the experts to tell us all about it!

Keris Panjang or executioner keris from Sumatra. Get rid of the rust and stain the blade. Very nice one.

I like this one Henk, but with a 13" blade i don't think we can call it a panjang... :shrug:

In this way and considering the meaning of the word panjang in the meaning of long or tall you're completely right David :o
But i refered to my native tongue. When we speak here in Holland about Keris Panjang we don't talk about the size of a keris. For many Dutch keris panjang is equal to excecutioners keris. :confused:

You will have to explain this a bit further for me Henk because i was completely unaware that in Holland you do not differentiate between keris Panjang, Anak Alang and Bahari. They do all have a similar profile/dhapur, but vary in size. And while there is certainly often debate which category the blade might be when the length falls into the gray zones, keris bahari are usually not confused with panjang or called "executioner keris". As far as i know only the longer keris panjang are the ones that are sometimes referred to as "executioner keris", though i find that name somewhat misleading since i do not believe that execution was the main purpose for this kind of keris. It was more a blade of status AFAIK. Though i had always thought that it was the extra length of these keris panjang that made them suitable to perform execution with the "bloodless" method through the collar bone area. I am not convinced that a 13" blade would be appropriate or effective for that action. :shrug:

Is it Bahari, then?
Still, 13" is plenty to reach the heart from the supraclavicular fossa and go through it, to boot.

Well Ariel..it's either a long Bahari of a short Anak Alang. ;)
As for how much length you need for the "job", keep in mind that the executioner would need to drive this blade all the way to the hilt to get 13" deep. Frankly, i'd rather not be the subject of THAT experiment! :eek: :D

Thanks for the comments Gents.

I will post some more pictures after a clean-up. Away to work for a month so don't hold your breath.

Regards
Roy

Nice original piece Roy.

The discussion so far brings up again the maddening problem of terminology in our highly complex little world. A Malay from Siak might have a completely different understanding of the terms, bahari, anak alang and panjang from that of a Malay from Kelantan. A Kelantanese would call this a keris bahari, our museum's original records sometimes record the term keris alang for similar pieces. The term panjang, which in Malay means "long", clearly ought to relate to a piece of a length greater than the usual, and 13 inches is probably about as average a length as you can get as far as kerises are concerned.

The keris panjang is also often referred to as a keris penyalang or "execution" keris. Of course any keris can be used to execute someone, and often were. The keris panjang/penyalang's role was as much symbolic as anything else. 19th century and later portraits of Malay rulers often show the king holding, or at least having in his presence, a keris panjang/penyalang. The underlying message being, I have the power of life or death over my subjects. And this, while also wearing his personal keris, which had a completely different symbolic message - portraying the king as the leader of his military forces and of his ability to defend himself and his right to make war.

So the short answer...call it a bahari, call it an alang or anak alang I suppose...please don't call it a keris panjang ;)

British scholars of the colonial period would have called this a "Malay" or "Malayan" keris. I think the Dutch did sometimes too ("Maleiche") although they tended to prefer "Sumatra", that is, when they bothered to pay any attention to Malay kerises anyway, which was rather rare, besotted as they were by central Javanese kerises. :rolleyes:

However the Malay world and particularly the area surrounding the Malacca Straits was a diverse cosmopolitan cultural complex that includes much of the eastern coast of Sumatra; from at least Deli south to about Jambi, and the western coast of the Malay Peninsula from about Kedah southwards into the Riau Archipelago. By at least the 18th century this area was a jumble of Malay, Minangkabau and Bugis influences...not to mention contemporary Indian and European tastes.

Its pretty difficult then to pin down exactly where this keris comes from. However, I presume by "local" antique shop you meant in Glastonbury? Not a hard and fast rule but it does at least favour the probability then that this piece was a colonial era bring back from Malaya. Also, there are at least a few pieces like this in our museum collection linked to Negeri Sembilan. One or two others are provenanced to Riau or to Sumatra though so...grain of salt.

It is a lovely piece though and I hope you are successful in cleaning it up...do please remeber that in restoration, very often, less is more.

David,

DAHenkel explained it already in his answer.
You would be surprised in how many houses here in Holland a keris or two is hanging on the wall while the owner has no idea of specific categories or names. It is just a piece of art from our history. Nothing more nothing less.

A few years ago a colleague asked me, you collect that stuff, don't you? I have a keris somewhere my father brought home when he serves as a marine in Indonesia. I will bring it for you, maybe you like it. He brought a very nice maduran keris an gave it to me. His brother has a dagger from his father. That dagger was a rencong.

And also collectors who like to hang some swords and daggers on the wall, who have no idea in detail what they have in their collection.

The differences we use here in the forum and the knowledge present here is great. The dutch collectors who participate on this forum and also some important collectors who don't participate on this forum are very aware of these specifications.

But most Dutch will call a Keris Bugis or Keris Palembang just a keris from Sumatra. If you can classify a keris in keris Java, Madura, Bali or Sumatra it is often said, he has knowledge about these things.

Well Henk, in my country most people would refer to any keris as "That weird knife thingy". :rolleyes: :D
From your original statement you gave me the idea that knowledgable collectors in the Netherlands don't make the distinction. That was my only reason for questioning you... :)

Thanks again Gents.

Yes it was purchased in Glastonbury. The shop new nothing about it's history.

I had never even considered this long enough to be considered as a keris Panjang. I have two of them and they are half as long again as this one.

What about the cup ? Anyone any suggestions on the fit of this ?

Regards
Roy

Though an attractive form the cup is certainly too large for the hilt, You might want to consider finding a smaller replacement. :shrug:

Please apologize my ignorance: such blade, and generally all blades without pamor, should be etched as Henk suggests or not ?
I have a few restored Panjang blades, but I did not etch them.

Hello Gio,

Some of the pamor-less Javanese blades are meant to be stained black with warangan treatment as you know.

In the Malay world including much of Sumatra, blades of this style are usually kept smooth: polished and only swiftly etched/stained. It stands to reason that the minority, blades with distinct miring pamor, will have benefited from warangan treatment while it is often not clear what the preferred treatment for the huge majority of laminated blades with only low-contrast pamor was in different areas historically. It's likely that this often only was an acid etch with fruit juice or vinegar.

Roy's blade is clearly laminated and this will most probably show nicely with little effort and some gentle etching.

Regards,
Kai

Hello Roy,

I'm with David, it's obviously a bad replacement (in addition to the non-fit, compare the quality of workmanship...); the ensemble would certainly benefit from a matching pendokok. Old ones are tough to find - you may want to consider having one made in the region?

Regards,
Kai