![]() |
A Kris For Show and Tell
5 Attachment(s)
Hi, Everyone,
Here's one that you might find interesting. Pommel made out of very old ivory, probably dugong. The pommel shape is similiar to that of Datu Piang's sword (please see his website) :D. Gangya is separate with Arabic writing (?) on the blade and a scabbard with bone on it. 18th, 19th century. What makes this sword more attractive is a carving of a moro vinta (small, fast boat) on both sides of the handle, tossed on huge waves, and a large shark or whale below the water's surface. I discovered this depiction after I bought it. The seller said that he didn't notice it at all, and said that he should have asked for a much higher price for it, had he effectively seen the high seas scene. :p. It is all of 29.05 inches; blade is 23.40 inches of solid, sharp steel. :D :D Enjoy! vince vince |
Nice and interesting piece. Not sure about the vinta, but I can see that it remembles a vinta. Anyway, the hilt looks older than the blade. The blade looks to be Maguinanao and perhaps made in the 1930s-early 1940s at the latest.
Is the ganga truly separate or is there just a line there? I ask because this was a transitional time where the separate ganga was being replaced by an engraved line to simulate a separate ganga. Nice piece in any case. LIke the talismanic diamonds on the blade. Also is the blade laminated? |
Hello Battara!
Yes, there is a clear and real separation to the gangya. No blade lamination is evident. take care. vince |
Oh :confused: 'lamination' as in those lines and designs on the blade! Yes, it has. I'll try to photograph these (with difficulty) and the separation on the gangya as soon as able.
me again, vince |
2 Attachment(s)
Pictures of separate gangya and lamination on blade.
best regards, vince |
Hello Vince,
That's a great kris, congrats! Another vote for a Maguindanao blade from the early 20th c. (or possibly turn of the century). Hilt does look older indeed. Could you please try to do a pencil rubbing of the engraving on the blade and post a close-up (easier to take an undistorted pic from the paper than shiny metal)? TIA! Please let me know whenever you decide to part with it! :) Regards, Kai |
BTW, I'm not sure that what the close-up shows is laminations (could also be an storage artifact). I do think that this is likely to be a laminated blade and that it deserves an etch. Have a look in the archives and feel free to PM for details!
Regards, Kai |
2 Attachment(s)
Hi Kai!
Here are pics of the markings. Sorry for the delay, and here's hoping they're not upside down :confused:. As to etching to see lamination, maybe just a small portion of the blade?? All my kris are unetched, all natural :o . Be well and thanks. vince |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.