Ethnographic Arms & Armour

Ethnographic Arms & Armour (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/index.php)
-   Ethnographic Weapons (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Pala-translation if possible (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=18123)

DaveS 6th February 2014 05:47 AM

Pala-translation if possible
 
12 Attachment(s)
Here is a Turkish pala for viewing. Probably a parade sword. The blade is 27 inches long, 33 inches long overall. It is a blade of the sham variety and on this particular piece no pattern is seen in these pictures. I have learned that Turkish wootz blades seem to give problems that other blades don't when they are etched. Sometimes no matter how clean the metal is that there will be cloudy areas that appear, that on the next clean and etch will be in a different part of the blade. I have etched this blade over a dozen times with varying degrees of success. Sometimes the pattern is barely discernible, sometimes like these pictures, not able to see anything. I've tried different acids with very little luck. Over the years I have etched many, many blades, but this one is the toughest one that I've run up against. Any ideas?..........Dave.

DaveS 6th February 2014 05:51 AM

More pictures
 
2 Attachment(s)
More pictures

DaveS 16th February 2014 05:40 AM

Is there no one who can help with a translation?????......Dave.

AJ1356 16th February 2014 04:55 PM

Hi Dave,
It looks nice and very peculiar at the same time. The scabbard with corrals and turquoise looks nice, can you tell me it they are real stone or not? I've racked my brain but can't make anything out of the inscription on the scabbard. Now on to the blade, I could not make anything out of the Arabic portions of it, it is supposed to be Qur'anic verses but I could not figure out if it really is or just something someone semi literate tried. Maybe one of out Arabic speakers can help you with. The maker's seal can not be read at all, was it like that form the beginning or is that the result of many cleanings and etchings? On the 8th picture down, the top seals reads Servant of Shah e Welaayat, Nader. The only Nader that comes to my mind is Nader Afshar. But he was not Turkish, he ruled over-very shortly- over what are today Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India. So, it is possible that in the tradition of the Safawids, the sword smith used the inscription, but with Nader's name. Still, that does not justify the reduction in the quality, I saw a later sword, maybe belonging to one of Nader's generals with quality the same as the Safawids. Without holding the item I can't say for sure if it is a much later piece meant for the whatever, but I am kinda leaning that way.

DaveS 16th February 2014 07:43 PM

AJ1356: Yes, the stones are real. A friend of my wife who is involved in lapidary work confirmed that. The back of the scabbard looks to be the normal embossing kind of work, to my eye anyway. As far as the inscriptions go though, if it makes no sense to you then we will have to leave it at that, although I have read that many of the people that did these inscriptions were themselves illiterate.........Dave.

AJ1356 17th February 2014 02:20 AM

Dave,
Upon inspections of the close up pic, it is right, the scabbard is NOT stamped.
It is possible that some of the inscription might be Turkish and not Farsi, Just the one seal.

Valjhun 18th February 2014 06:22 PM

Nice pala indeed.

I a similar dagger, which I posted some time ago for translation.

Can you help AJ1356?

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=18120


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.